<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>The Three Basic Personality Types of Greenhouse Gas Believers </title>
		<description>Discuss The Three Basic Personality Types of Greenhouse Gas Believers </description>
		<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:57:47 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/207/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Berthold Klein says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-420</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I realize that this is about science but we can take a lesson from the Bible. When Mosses lead the former slaves of Egypt into the desert for 40 years it was to let the two generations of brainwashed die off and be replaced with real thinkers. We're in the same boat, it took 40 years to brainwash 90% of the people in the world including many supposed scientists, now it will take just as long for the Brainwashed to die off. The important thing is to educate the young and prevent them from becoming part of the Brainwashed the Gorezillias. Mother Nature- the weather is doing a good job of showing that the “Greenhouse gas effect” is a hoax.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Berthold Klein</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:12:04 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-420</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>John OSullivan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-408</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Andy, I'm totally with you on the issue of wind turbines-they are counter-productive.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>John OSullivan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:32:33 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-408</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndyG55 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And yet, wind turbines, probably one of the most deadly environmental devices ever invented, are held up as the poster child of the AGW movement.. These people are NOT environmentalists, they don't give one hoot for the environment. If they did have any real understanding, they would know that CO2 has ONLY beneficial effects on the world's environmental sustainablity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndyG55</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:15:20 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MyersKL says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-404</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Anthony Watts is to be commended for the work he has done exposing the AGW fraud. It's a shame he continues to promote the so-called greenhouse effect, an unproven hypothesis that was challenged immediately when it was first advanced in the late 1800s. I'm still waiting for any hard empirical or observational evidence supporting the contention that made-made CO2 (a small fraction of the total 0.04 percent CO2) causes any measurable global atmospheric warming. Climate realists weaken their case when they openly embrace the very foundation of the alarmists' argument. I fear that many "mainstream" AGW skeptics live in fear of peer ostracism and, therefore, are afraid to question the widely accepted theory of CO2-induced atmospheric warming. Ferenc Miskolczi and others (including the "Slayers") have put forth convincing research that completely undermines the theory of human-induced global warming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MyersKL</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:56:52 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-404</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>John OSullivan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-399</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jose, Indeed - the sad irony is that most skeptics I know are staunchly in favor of cutting down environmental pollution. The difference between us and the green zealots is that we know carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but a life-giving essential gas.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>John OSullivan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:38:58 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-399</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>John OSullivan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with you RJ - in my experience both Monckton and Watts are utterly closed-minded to questioning anything about their beliefs; even though neither of them can claim to be climate experts.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>John OSullivan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:35:56 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-398</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jose lori says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I made it simpler and have always felt that the AGW cult is comprised of two groups. The first group (the followers) includes the uninformed, the gullible, the well intentioned but naive, the sincere but misled, many journalists and researchers, and yes, the just plain stupid. I would think it safe to say that these people all believe that most of the recent global warming must have been or was caused by human activity – primarily CO2 emissions and that wind farms fix the problem. These people are not evil, they are just wrong. How anyone could rationally think that the IPCC fairytales prove their position is beyond hope and not worthy of debate. The second group (the leaders) includes primary, government funded researchers, left leaning political leaders like Kerry, activist and environmentalist leadership, and, of course, the Hansens, Gores, Manns, Briffas, Pachauri, and the rest of the extremists with which we are burdened. To the surprise of those in the first group, but not at all to the rest of us, these people do not necessarily believe or, for the most part, even care if global warming is anthropogenic. And, unlike the first group, these people are not only evil and wrong but also dangerous. They are not out to save the world but to gain political power and financial control over individuals, businesses and countries. There are legitimate environmental issues. Surly we must continue to fight for and to find a way to protect our environment, reduce stress on fisheries, manage water, land and forest resources, protect endangered species if possible and were practical, and a myriad other environmental issues and crises we face. The real tragedy of the AGW shibboleth is that it will destroy the credibility of legitimate environmental movements, divert needed funding away from them, and make the efforts of those movements even more difficult. And this is why the people of the first group, if and when they ever figure it out, should forever condemn those of the second. The rest of us already have.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jose lori</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:54:58 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-397</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-396</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good article These so called sceptics (including Anthony and Lord Monckton's) attitude towards slayer science is very odd. I'm unsure what the reason is (your above reason may be right) but it does their credibility no good at all. I no longer consider Wattsup as a credible website. Its now no better than any other alarmist website. They are anti science (and anti open debate) and anti science is anti science regardless.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:43:50 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/207-the-three-basic-personality-types-of-greenhouse-gas-believers-#comment-396</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
